On the issue of improving the legal regulation of the lawyer’s activities to protect the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34858/api.1.2022.25Keywords:
right to defense, collection of evidence, status of the defender, forensic examination, investigation, the principle of adversarialAbstract
The amendments to the criminal procedural legislation in 2017–2021 were aimed to strengthen guarantees and ensuring the implementation of the principle of the right to defense and the principle of adversarial parties in criminal proceedings. The analysis of the legal practice shows that, some situations which arise in law enforcement practice significantly complicate and restrict activities of advocates in criminal cases. It should be noted that quite often that activity of a lawyer can cause a negative reaction, both from the investigative authorities and the court, and from organizations to which the lawyer makes requests. This creates unreasonable problems for the lawyer to fulfill his obligations to provide legal assistance to a citizen guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In order to minimize such situations in law enforcement practice, appropriate regulatory legal acts should be adopted to ensure the lawyer’s rights to protect the interests of his client and guarantees of responsible attitude on the part of officials to his human rights activities.
Downloads
References
Konstitucia Rossiyskoy Federacii, 25 dekabrya 1993, redakcia 21 julya 2014, oficialniy internet portal pravovoy informacii www.pravo.gov.ru
View in Google Scholar
Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August–7 September 1990, www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/UNBasicPrinciplesontheRoleofLawyers.pdf
View in Google Scholar
Charter of Core principles the European Legal Professions, www.ccbe.eu/NTCdocument/EN_CCBE_CoCpdf1_1382973057.pdf [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Code of Conduct for Lawyers in the European Union, www.ccbe.eu/NTCdocument/EN_CCBE_CoCpdf1_1382973057.pdf [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Federalniy Zakon Rossiyskoy Federacii 31.05.2001 N 73-FZ, O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii, «Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federacii», 04.06 2001, N 23, st. 2291.
View in Google Scholar
Federalniy Zakon Rossiyskoy Federacii от 31.05.2002 N 63-FZ (edit. 31.07.2020); Ob advokratskoy deyatelnosti i advokature v Rossiyskoy Federacii, «Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federacii», 10.06.2002, N 23, st. 2102.
View in Google Scholar
Kodeks professionalnoy etiki advokata (prinyat I Vserossiyskim s’ezdom advokatov 31.01.2003) (edit. оt 15.04.2021), «Vestnik Federalnoi palati advokatov RF» 2003, N 2.
View in Google Scholar
Ugolovno-processualniy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (prinyat 18.12.2001, N 174-FZ, redakcia 23.09.2021), «Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federacii», 24.12.2001, №52 (chast 1), st. 4921.
View in Google Scholar
Davletov A.A., Advokatskoie rassledovanie: mif ili realnost, «Sudebnaiy vlast i ugolovniy procces» 2020, №1, s.74.
View in Google Scholar
Korpus publichnoy advokatury: chto kroetsya za krasivym nazwaniem, advokat-rating.ru/publikatsii/korpus-publichnoy-advokatury-chto-kroetsya-za-krasivym-nazvaniem/ [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Martinchik E.G., Advocatskoie rassledovanie v ugolovnom proccese / Teoretico-metodologicheskie osnovi doktrini advokatskogo rassledovanis, Moskva 2012, s. 121.
View in Google Scholar
Narusheniya prav advokatov trebuyut zakonodatelnogo reagirovaniya, fparf.ru/news/fpa/narusheniya-prav-advokatov-trebuyut-zakonodatelnogo-reagirovaniya/ [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Poyasnitelnaya zapiska k proektu Federalnogo Zakona «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovniy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii I Ugolovno-processualniy Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (v chasti ustanovleniya dopolnitelnih garantiy realizacii principa sostayzatelnosti storon)» (podgotovlen Ministerstvom usticii 1.09.2020), base.garant.ru/56844976/ [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Schetnaya Palata usomnilas v effektivnosti rashodov na gosadvokatov, www.rbc.ru/society/25/02/2020/5e54353b9a7947b57c1760eb
View in Google Scholar
Svedeniya o sostave advokatskogo soobshestva v Rossiyskoy Federacii 2020, fparf.ru/practical-information/statistics/obshchaya-chislennost-advokatskogo-soobshchestva-rossii/ [data dostupa: 20 octyabria 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 29-12-2022 (5)
- 29-12-2022 (4)
- 29-12-2022 (3)
- 19-10-2022 (2)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vyacheslav Nizamov, Viadymir Pristankov, Natalija Sidorova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.